Here we go again, folks. Space shuttle Endeavour, currently docked with the International Space Station, has tile damage on the belly of the spacecraft. The damage is no doubt the result of ice or foam debris shaken loose from the boosters hitting the orbiter during launch. Following the Columbia re-entry loss in 2003 every shuttle undergoes detailed examination upon reaching orbit. I believe all 6 shuttle missions since the loss of Columbia have found damage to the heat shield tiles upon reaching orbit. The reality is that every shuttle ever launched has suffered damage during launch. One out of roughly 100 missions was lost because of that damage. In other words, this is probably nothing to worry about. Statistical reality check aside, the damage this time around may be a little more serious than previous instances in that it appears the damaged tile may have been completely penetrated, exposing underlying insulation and the frame of the orbiter itself. Further investigations in the coming week will determine need for repair. The incident is made all the more poignant in that one of the crew is a civilian teacher who was in fact the backup to Christa McAuliffe on the Challenger mission lost in 1986. This stuff makes for great news, but rest assured, everything will be fine.
I think that our hypersensitivity to shuttle damage is similar to the hypersensitivity to damage that accompanies commercial air travel. Forty years ago commercial aircraft probably flew regularly with damages that would ground them today. Similarly, space shuttles flew and landed in the 80s and 90s with damage that is currently unacceptable. I'm not suggesting the attention to damage isn't a good thing, it is, but the engineering of complex flying machines always involves margin, i.e. wiggle room in design and construction that gives us outs if something fails. So yes, tiles may be damaged, but that does not mean disaster is imminent.